William De Vijlder

Group Chief Economist BNP Paribas

Fiscal and monetary policy

William De Vijlder examines fiscal and monetary policy through the lens of government and central bank decisions (including the ECB, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England), with a special focus on changes in a country’s budget balance and public sector debt.

Federal Reserve

United States: Data-dependent discomfort

Recent indicators point towards ongoing strong US growth. The non-manufacturing ISM index has caused a jump in treasury yields: data-dependent forward guidance implies that investors expect the Fed will not remain passive when data are particularly strong. Growth outside the US is slowing yet higher US yields have been mimicked across the globe. The dollar has also strengthened which is unwelcome news for corporates in developing economies which carry a lot of debt in USD.

Read more

Fed: the Phillips curve is flat

Fed chairman Jerome Powell made important comments during his press conference. Fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path and lasting widespread tariffs would be bad for the US and the world. Monetary policy remains accommodative and data-dependent. Markets liked the dovish bias in the message.

Read more

Fed: Avoiding the risks of stargazing

In assessing its monetary policy stance, the Fed pays attention to differences between realised and target inflation, unemployment and its natural rate, the policy rate and its neutral rate. Estimates of these reference points are highly uncertain. For this reason the Fed adopts a pragmatic approach based on data-dependence and gradualism: dovishness still prevails.

Read more
Fed building

Fed: Market considers tightening cycle is well advanced

Recent Federal Reserve research shows that the slope of the short end of the yield curve is a more reliable indicator than the commonly used difference between 10-year and 1 or 2-year US Treasury yields. In a similar vein, we can look at the difference between the forward 3-month LIBOR rate and the spot rate. This difference has increased as of late. However, the level and shape of the entire forward curve show that the market is of the view that the Fed tightening cycle is well advanced.

Read more

ECB: nervousness postponed

Skilful expectations management meant that the announcement of the end of the net purchases of the QE program didn’t cause any stirs. Markets have applauded the introduction of date and state dependent guidance. In the course of next year, nervousness will increase again as investors will wonder whether conditions are met to warrant a first rate hike in this cycle.

Read more

Constraints on monetary policy push towards unconstrained investing

February’s surge in volatility, the recent dip in the eurozone’s growth momentum, the prospects of a series of US key rate hikes and of the ECB’s change of tone as it prepares to halt quantitative easing (QE) are all factors that risk intensifying arguments in favour of high conviction approaches to asset management in the months ahead: unconstrained investing makes a comeback.

Read more
choices and decisions

US: FOMC (a)symmetries

The FOMC has an asymmetrical loss function: avoiding a recession is more important than avoiding the risk of overheating. With this comes the necessity of a symmetrical inflation objective: a temporary overshooting is acceptable. Given the unclear relationship between unemployment and inflation, the Fed’s tone remains cautious despite upbeat growth projections.

Read more
ECB by night

ECB: predictable projections create dovish bias

Core inflation projections by the ECB have followed a surprisingly predictable path. Starting at close to but below 2% for long horizons, they decline as the remaining horizon shortens. The big difference between the projections at long horizons and the eventual outcome implies they provide little information to the market: they simple confirm the ECB’s objective. They can also introduce a dovish policy bias.

Read more